Student Protest at Careers Fair Over Arms Investment

Protesters play dead in the Great Hall

On the 27th October at the Autumn Careers Fair, University of Bristol students including two UBU Student Officers, Vice President Welfare & Equality Sophie Bennett and VP Community Max Wakefield, staged a dramatic "die in" at the Autumn Careers Fair.  The students claim that Barclays invests £7.3bn in the global arms sector making them by far the largest global investor, a claims supported by the website Bristol Against Arms Trade.  After being served with a disciplinary letter, the protesters cooperated with security and peacefully left the building.

 


The protest followed discussion at last week's Student Council about whether the Students' Union should support action against companies that produce or invest in the production of armaments to having presence at University events such as the Careers Fair. 

 

According to VP Community Max Wakefield, the students involved in the protest ‘want to raise awareness of the presence of companies in the arms trade at careers fairs in order to help students make informed decisions about employment opportunities’.

 

Two motions relating to arms companies have been submitted for debate at the Students' Conference on Saturday 29th October.  During the decision-making session that begins at 3pm, any student will be able to have his or her say on motions calling for more diversity in companies at careers fairs & permission for student protest and for a stance of opposition by the Students’ Union towards financial involvement of arms companies in the University of Bristol.

 

At the Conference, students can also take part in a variety of officer- and student-led forums, raise any issue that is affecting their university experience, and vote on the other motions that have been submitted.  

Comments

Please login to comment.

Dave Underwood
9:29am on 11 Apr 13 Le portail des assistante maternelle c'est sur formationassistantematernelle
James Brown
4:29pm on 28 Oct 11 I am concerned that two of our union's elected representatives have been taking part in such a protest without any mandate from the student body. Though they are of course allowed to protest personally held views, they are not entitled to do so as representatives of UBU (as this article clearly portrays them as) as this reflects potentially harmfully on the rest of the student body. I also think this article is extremely ill advised considering the two motions coming up at the AGM as it suggests a serious pre existing bias in favour of these motions in UBU and thus risks prejudcing the democratic process. James Brown Vice President The University of Bristol Engineering Society (TUBES)